SomeFYI
Considerations for a Fair and Just Society
The content of this website is intended to be considered opinion protected under the First Amendment. The author intends to outline the facts making it clear that the challenged statements represent the author's own interpretation of those facts and leaving the reader free to draw his own conclusions. Partington v. Bugliosi, 56 F.3d 1147, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1995).
Political Parties recognized to be harmful to society
Apr 20, 2025
Read the opinion "Political Parties recognized to be harmful to society".  Discussion includes how voters can take action.  Do you agree?
Government Union blocks public services to Compromised Persons
Sep 6, 2018
A group of government employees organized to deny children public school services.   See the explanation by the local school superintendent.
Questions to ponder:
1) Is it proper that any person, or group of people, be permitted to block or impede the provision of government services?

2) Is it proper that the State government allows children living in some neighborhoods to be provided far less State public school services than children living in other neighborhoods?

Unequal public education based on district residence continues - Public Officials ignore law
Sep 6, 2016
The California State Supreme Court has ruled that public education is a Fundamental Protected Right to be managed by the State rather by local governance.

"[M]anagement and control of the public schools [is] a matter of state[, not local,] care and supervision...." Butt v. State of California (1992) 4 Cal. 4Th 674, 693. citing Kennedy v. Miller (1893) 97 Cal. 429, 431.

The court ruled that public education must be basically equal for all children.

"In sum, the California Constitution guarantees 'basic' equality in public education, regardless of district residence." Butt v. State of California (1992)

However, the California Department of Education (CDE) continues to ignore the Ruling. In 2024, the CDE stated: "California is a Local Control State. This means that your local school district is governed and managed by your elected school board trustees. The Civic Center Act does not specifically authorize enforcement oversight by the California Department of Education or any other agency. Hence, when constituents request clarification on how much districts charge for the use of their facilities, the CDE must direct them to their local school board."

The State constitution states "The Governor shall see that the law is faithfully executed." Governor also ignores the court rulings.

Drinking fountain.
2009 - Independence HS East San Jose, CA
Grafitti stays for a long time.
2009 - Silver Creek HS East San Jose, CA
Classroom white board used for school bathroom privacy partitian.
2009 - Independence HS East San Jose, CA
Showers exposed to wood and rot.
2009 - Independence HS East San Jose, CA
Questions to ponder:
Should the California Department of Education be adhering to the State Supreme Court ruling?

Should the State Governor take action to assure that the law is being followed?

Does disparity in public education service and facilities foster resentment against the government?

The State officials are in the same political party as local officials. Do public officials become blind to violations of law by their fellow elected officials in the same political party?
Government worker compensation far exceeds compensation of workers in the private sector for similar education and experience.
Sep 20, 2018
Government employed elementary public school teachers earn far more than practicing Physicians, Optometrists and Engineers.  Government public school teachers work 184 days per year as compared to a standard 250 days per year for non-government employees.   See the details based on government records.
Questions to ponder:
Should government employees be compensated basically equal to non-government workers having a similar skillset complexity and experience?

Should competing private businesses provide public services rather than government employees? (the government sets the quality and level of service standards)

If government employees enjoy having a pension, should private company employees also enjoy a the right to pension at the same rate?

Example of corruption by local elected officials
Apr 20, 2024
School Board members in the largest high school district in northern California (ESUHSD), a recipient of State and Federal funding, accept tens of thousands dollars in "campaign donations" from contractors and then award no-bid contracts to the gifters. 

There is no enforcement against the practice.  It appears that those responsible to enforce the law that prohibits such practice are in the same political party as the school board members.  Local school boards and City councils are stepping boards to higher level elected offices.

Read the details.

ESUHSD board members - 2024
Questions to ponder:
Is it proper for a government official to accept a personal "campaign donation" gift and then subsequently use their official position to provide a targeted government benefit in return to the gifter?
Charging families for public school services
Oct 20, 2024
The largest school district in northern California (ESUHSD) denies parents and guardians to see their own children participate in public school events open to the public unless the parents/guardians pay a fee.  The amount of compensation paid to government employed school staff to collect the fee appears to far exceed the amounts collected.  Most importantly, however, parents are being denied to observe their children's public school activities because of their inability to pay.

It is believed that the collection of funds from parents/guardians by public schools violates the intent of State law.  Parents have been seen trying to observe their own children outside of gated events because they don't have enough to pay the public school.

ESUHSD board members - 2024
Questions to ponder:
Is it proper for the government to charge families to be involved with their children's public school activities?

Is the purpose of public education to provide even footing for all children regardless of their family economic background?

Would young people develop build resentment towards the government because other parents were allowed to attend their public school events but their own parents/guardians were not permitted?

Is it proper that parents/guardians be prohibited from seeing their own children in public school activities because of their economic status?

Contact SomeFYI at: somefyi -at- somefyi.org